Nvidia AI : Nvidia, Palantir and others ask employees to stop using OpenAI and Anthropic AI models; warn the two companies: we will ban you unless you guarantee no ‘stealing’ of… |


Nvidia, Palantir and others ask employees to stop using OpenAI and Anthropic AI models; warn the two companies: we will ban you unless you guarantee no 'stealing' of…
Palantir, Nvidia and Booz Allen are curbing employee use of Anthropic and OpenAI’s AI models over corporate data fears.

Three of the biggest enterprise technology names in the US are now setting terms for the two biggest AI labs. Nvidia, Palantir and Booz Allen Hamilton have either restricted how their staff use advanced models from Anthropic and OpenAI or threatened to drop them altogether, unless the labs can promise that proprietary corporate data will not be stored, read or absorbed into future training runs. The Information reported the pushback on Monday, and the specifics suggest this has moved well past a routine procurement complaint.Palantir has asked Anthropic for an irrevocable zero data retention guarantee before it will make Claude available inside its own software. Nvidia has confined Anthropic’s models to internal work it considers low risk and routes anything proprietary to its own Nemotron models instead. Booz Allen Hamilton has barred employees from running Anthropic’s commercial model on cybersecurity projects that touch client data.

Anthropic’s 30-day data retention rule is what set this off

The trigger is a policy change Anthropic made in June alongside Claude Fable 5, its first widely available Mythos-class model. Prompts and outputs on covered models are held for 30 days, and anything flagged by the safety classifiers can sit for up to two years. Anthropic’s reasoning is that a single request looks harmless in isolation, and that attacks such as best-of-N jailbreaking or state-backed espionage only become visible when hundreds of requests are analysed together. The company has said consistently that none of the retained data is used for training.Microsoft was the first large customer to flinch. The Verge reported in June that Claude Fable 5 was missing from the model picker used by Microsoft’s own staff on internal GitHub Copilot, even as the company shipped the same model to Copilot and Foundry customers, while its lawyers worked through the retention terms. The hesitation has spread since. Northrop Grumman runs open-source models on air-gapped servers. Novo Nordisk still uses Claude but keeps proprietary data away from it. One large US utility abandoned a Fable test for its core power infrastructure after Anthropic declined to sign a non-revocable zero data retention clause.

Nvidia and Palantir are now building the alternative themselves

Rather than wait, the two have shipped a product. Last week they unveiled a platform that pairs Palantir’s software with Nvidia’s open Nemotron models, letting organisations customise on their own operational data without it leaving their control. Nvidia is the first customer, applying it to its own supply chain. The commercial logic is plain. Every enterprise that cannot get a retention guarantee is a prospect. Microsoft is working the same anxiety, pitching isolated cloud environments that send nothing to an outside model provider.The worry is not only about documents leaking out. Ohalo chief executive David Friedberg said on a podcast on Friday that his company is “moving off Claude for a lot of our sensitive data” and moving work to locally run models, citing cases where ideas discussed with one model appeared to resurface elsewhere.

Anthropic’s answer is Enterprise Frontier Safeguards

Anthropic changed course on September 1 with Enterprise Frontier Safeguards, which lets business customers keep activity data in their own Amazon S3, Azure Blob or Google Cloud storage under their own encryption keys. Automated scanning still runs, but no Anthropic employee reads anything. It costs nothing, works through direct access or a cloud provider, and reaches broader availability this fall. Neither lab trains on enterprise data by default, though both collect anonymised metadata, and that unresolved grey area is what customers such as C Spire still want defined.The new system covers most of what these customers have been asking for. It does not cover the one thing Palantir wants, which is a guarantee that cannot be withdrawn later. Nvidia has already stopped waiting for that and built its way around the problem, and every month the labs spend negotiating gives the next customer the same idea.



Source link

HTML Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com